|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Here is something that happened last week. A prospect jumped on a discovery call with a management consulting firm. Before the call, he typed his problem into ChatGPT. In thirty seconds, he had a strategy framework, three potential root causes, and a recommended action plan. It was not perfect. But it was pretty good. And it was free.
He still took the call. But something had shifted. He now had an anchor for what generic advice sounds like. And when the consultant walked him through a similar framework, the prospect’s first thought was not “this is valuable.” It was “I already have something similar to this.”
That moment is playing out in thousands of conversations right now. And if your firm sells broad, general expertise, it is coming for you next.
The Generalist’s Old Advantage Is Gone
For a long time, breadth was a legitimate selling point. “We have seen it all. We work across industries. We bring outside perspective.” And for years, that was hard to get anywhere else. Clients hired generalist firms because pattern recognition across domains was scarce and expensive.
It is not scarce anymore.
Large language models do pattern recognition at a scale no human team can match. They have read every case study, every framework, every HBR article. They can synthesize across industries instantly. They do not sleep, they do not bill by the hour, and they improve every few months.
This does not mean generalist consultants are useless. It means the floor has risen. The baseline of “smart, general advice” is now available to anyone with an internet connection. When your pitch sounds like something a client could get from a well-crafted prompt, this is problematic.
Specialization Is the Only Defensible Moat
Deep, narrow expertise creates three things that AI cannot replicate.
The first is proprietary context. Not the kind of context you find in industry reports, but the kind you accumulate by spending years inside a specific domain. Knowing that hospital CFOs will never approve that proposal structure. Knowing that SaaS companies at $15M ARR hit a specific hiring wall that looks different from the one at $40M. Knowing what actually happens when a private equity firm does a platform acquisition in industrial services, not what the playbook says should happen.
The second is relationship density. When you are the recognized expert in a narrow space, referrals compound. You are not one of twelve firms a buyer is considering. You are the one their peer told them to call. That kind of trust does not get disrupted by a chatbot.
The third is implementation scar tissue. You have tried things in this exact domain and watched them fail. You have recovered. You know where the bodies are buried. That lived experience is invisible to AI because it was never written down. It lives in your team’s judgment, not in a dataset.
The Math That Generalists Avoid
Founders resist specialization because it feels like shrinking. “If I narrow my focus, I will lose opportunities.”
A generalist firm pitching across ten industries might close at 15%. The buyer is comparing you to a dozen other firms who all sound the same. Price pressure is intense. The sales cycle drags because the prospect is not sure you understand their world.
A specialist firm pitching one industry closes at 50% or higher. The buyer already trusts that you get it. The sales cycle is shorter because there is less education required. And the fee premium is real, often two to three times what a generalist can charge, because the perceived risk to the buyer drops dramatically when they hire someone who has done exactly this before.
Referral density goes up too. In a narrow market, your clients know each other. One great engagement becomes three introductions. In a broad market, your clients are scattered and disconnected. Every new deal starts from scratch.
Revenue per employee goes up. Marketing spend goes down. Win rates go up. Client lifetime value goes up. The math works, even though it feels counterintuitive.
Addressing the Fear Directly
“But I will lose revenue.”
Yes, you will. Some of it. The clients who hired you because you were convenient, or cheap, or available. The projects that were outside your sweet spot but paid the bills. That revenue was already under pressure. AI has accelerated the process.
The revenue you gain by specializing is different. It is defensible. It comes with higher margins, stronger retention, and clients who see you as essential rather than interchangeable.
The transition is uncomfortable. There is a period where you are saying no to work that used to sustain you, before the new pipeline has fully materialized. That gap is real, and it is the reason most founders never make the shift. But the founders who push through it consistently end up with better firms on the other side.
A Simple Test You Can Run Today
Describe your firm’s expertise in one sentence. If it includes the word “and” more than once, or if you could swap your firm’s name with fifty others and the sentence would still be accurate, you are a generalist.
Now ask your last five clients why they hired you specifically. Not why they needed help. Why they picked you. If the answers are vague (“you seemed smart,” “good chemistry,” “you were responsive”), that is a specialization gap. Those are things any competent firm can offer.
If the answers are specific (“you are the only firm that understands revenue cycle management for mid-size hospital systems,” “you have done exactly this integration three times before”), you are on the right track.
The Firms That Win in 2026
The firms that thrive this year will not be the ones that adopted AI the fastest. They will be the ones that got so specific that AI could not replace them.
Generalists compete with technology. Specialists compete with no one.
The best time to specialize was five years ago. The second best time is this quarter.