Speed Isn’t About Execution. It’s About Decision-Making.

Why faster work isn’t leading to faster timelines

Artificial intelligence is changing professional services. Clients now expect work to be faster, cheaper, and better. For the purpose of this article, let’s focus on one: speed.

A few months ago, a client asked if we could complete a project in three weeks instead of eight.

In theory, yes. The work itself can now be done much faster.

But there was a catch.

Throughout any project, clients have multiple opportunities to give feedback. In our case, that can range from four to ten touchpoints, with 48-hour windows for each round. That structure exists for a reason. It gives the project momentum while still allowing clients time to think, align internally, and make decisions.

So I told them:

“Yes, we can move that fast, as long as you’re comfortable not giving feedback or giving it instantly.”

That’s when the real constraint became clear.

Every Firm Has a Version of Feedback

While we are a marketing agency, this dynamic is not unique to creative work.

Every professional services firm has its own version of feedback. In consulting, it shows up as alignment. In legal, it’s review and approval. In finance, it’s diligence and sign-off.

The names change, but the process is the same.

The work itself might take days. Final decisions still often take weeks.

The Work Got Faster. The Decisions Didn’t.

Professional services firms can now produce at a speed that simply wasn’t possible before.

But most firms are still bound by the same thing they’ve always been bound by: how quickly their clients can make decisions.

This is the shift.

The constraint is no longer execution. It’s decision-making.

Faster Timelines Require Faster Decisions

Clients are asking for faster timelines, and in many cases, firms are capable of delivering on that request.

But if you want a project to move three times as fast, the decision-making process has to move three times as fast as well.

That means feedback windows shrink from 48 hours to same-day. It may mean fewer stakeholders are involved, or at the very least, those stakeholders are aligned much more quickly. It means internal conversations are compressed.

At that point, the question shifts from:

“Can the firm move faster?”
to
“Is the client actually comfortable making decisions this quickly?”

In my experience, the answer is usually no.

Speed Is a Risk Decision

This becomes even more pronounced as the stakes increase.

A higher-value project requires more diligence, more review, and more certainty. There is simply more to lose if something is missed.

A lower-value project can move faster because there is less risk associated with moving quickly.

At its core, speed is a decision about risk tolerance.

Moving faster often means accepting that not every detail will be scrutinized to the same degree. Sometimes that trade-off is acceptable. Often, it is not.

Why Projects Actually Slow Down

What tends to happen is predictable.

At the beginning of the project, there is a strong push for speed. Everyone is aligned. The urgency is high.

But as the work progresses, new ideas emerge. Perspectives shift. Internal alignment starts to break down.

The need for discussion increases. Feedback takes longer. The timeline stretches.

Not because the firm couldn’t move fast, but because the client couldn’t sustain the pace they initially asked for.

What AI Actually Changed

AI has raised expectations around how quickly work should be delivered.

But it has not removed the need for human decision-making. If anything, it has exposed it.

I’ve always found it funny watching Mad Men. They would go out drinking in the middle of the day. This is because real-time feedback didn’t exist. There was no expectation of an instant response.

Over time, email changed that. Everyone became more responsive. Now AI has taken it one step further. Work isn’t expected quickly anymore. It is expected instantly.

AI accelerated the speed of execution. It made more possible, and made it possible faster.

But it didn’t change how decisions get made. Stakeholders still need to align. Risks still need to be evaluated. People still need time to think.

The work got faster. Decision-making didn’t.

That gap is where friction lives.

The bottleneck didn’t disappear. It moved. In many cases, it moved from the service provider to the client.

What This Means Going Forward

If you run a professional services firm, you need to rethink how you talk about speed with your clients.

Faster timelines are possible, but they require faster decisions. Client responsiveness is not separate from delivery. It is a core component.

And when decisions are made more quickly, there are real trade-offs that need to be acknowledged upfront.

The most effective way to handle this is to be direct:

“We can move as fast as you want. As long as you can keep up.”

Your tools may be faster than ever, but your projects will only move as fast as your client decides.

Call to Action

Take the first step in preparing for your journey:

Join Collective 54  and Subscribe to Collective 54 Insights to access resources, expertise, and a network of leaders that assist professional service firms in managing the ownership lifecycle phases.

Connect with me on LinkedIn to continue the conversation.